Jetzt mit Plus alles auf einer Seite lesen


pro Monat

12 Monate


beim Abschluss eines 12-Monats-Abos

Günstigster Preis
Zugang zu allen exklusiven Artikeln, Videos & Podcast-Folgen
Werbefreiheit auf &
Auf geht's

pro Monat

3 Monate

20% gegenüber Flexi-Abo sparen
Zugang zu allen exklusiven Artikeln, Videos & Podcast-Folgen
Werbefreiheit auf &
Auf geht's

pro Monat

1 Monat

Monatlich kündbar
Zugang zu allen exklusiven Artikeln, Videos & Podcast-Folgen
Werbefreiheit auf &
Auf geht's

Diskussion Kirk vs. Slusallek

Als Ergänzung zu unserem großen Report 3D-Grafik 2006 in GameStar 07/2004 veröffentlichen wir eine von GameStar moderierte, englischsprachige Diskussion zwischen dem Chef-Wissentschaftler von Nvidia, David Kirk, und dem renommierten Informatik-Professer Philipp Slusallek von der Uni Saarbrücken. Thema des ausführlichen und mit vielen Zusatzinfos gespickten Gesprächs: Die Vor- und Nachteile aktueller Render-Verfahren im Vergleich zu Raytracing.

19.05.2004 09:52 Uhr

Ray tracing or rasterization?

GameStar: Current games are rendered via the well-known rasterization technique. Ray tracing is an old technology, but for the first time we've the power to calculate it in real-time. Why is ray tracing the better (or the worse) technique to render a PC game?

David Kirk, chief scientist of Nvidia.David Kirk, chief scientist of Nvidia.

Kirk: Rasterization (Painter's Algorithm or Depth Buffering) has a rendering time that is typically linear in the number of triangles that are drawn, because each polygon must be processed. Since there is specialized hardware for rasterization in modern GPUs, this time is very small per triangle, and modern GPUs can draw 600M polygons per second, or so. Also, Z or depth culling and hierarchical culling can allow the game to not even draw large numbers of polygons, making the complexity even less than linear.

Although it is tempting to think of GPUs as only rasterization engines, modern GPUs are now highly programmable parallel floating processors. The rasterization part of the GPU is only a small part; most of the hardware is devoted to 32-bit floating point shader processors. So, it is now possible to demonstrate real time ray tracing running on GPUs. It is not yet faster than rasterization, but often ray tracers are doing more calculation for the global illumination - shadows, reflections, etc.

I don't think of this as "ray tracing vs. rasterization". I think of it as ray tracing and rasterization. Rasterization hardware can be used to accelerate the intersection and lighting calculations that are part of ray tracing. In particular, the initial visibility calculations - what's in front - are best done with rasterization. Reflections, transparency, etc, can be done with ray tracing shader programs.

Slusallek: Since I am not limited by company politics I will try to be a bit controversial in my responses :-).

Philipp Slusallek, renowned professor of information technology (University of Saarbrücken, Germany). Philipp Slusallek, renowned professor of information technology (University of Saarbrücken, Germany).

Ray tracing offers a fairly long list of advantages over rasterization. The fundamental difference is that rasterization can only look at a single triangle at a time. However, most effects require access to at least two triangles: e.g. casting a shadow from one triangle to the other, computing the reflection of one triangle off of another, or simulating the indirect illumination due to light bouncing between all triangles in the scene.

Rasterization must do various tricks to even approximate these effects, e.g. using reflections maps instead of real reflection. For changing environments these maps must be re-computed for every frame using costly additional rendering passes. But even worse, they are simply incorrect for almost all geometry, in particular for close-by or curved objects. Try rendering a car that reflects the street correctly -- games don't, because they can't.

Another big advantage of ray tracing is the ability to render huge data sets very efficiently. Recently we implemented a very simple addition to ray tracing that allows for rendering a Boeing 777 model consisting of ~350 million polygons (roughly 30 GB on disk) at 2-3 frames per second on a single dual Opteron system with just 3-4 GB of memory. Since it uses ray tracing you can automatically also render it with shadows, reflections, and complex shading even in such a large model.

You see, ray tracing is a fundamentally new way of doing interactive graphics that opens up many new opportunities for doing things that were impossible before. Many researchers are picking up realtime ray tracing now that we have demonstrated it running with realtime performance.

1 von 8

nächste Seite


Nur angemeldete Benutzer können kommentieren und bewerten.

Cookies optimieren die Bereitstellung unserer Dienste. Mit der Nutzung unserer Dienste erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies verwenden. Weitere Informationen oder schließen